Uncategorized

Does Michelin matter anymore?

September 2018

 

Michelin image.jpg

“The Michelin Guide has been around for an astonishing 118 years. But, has it run its course?”


The Michelin Guide returns later today, but it’s not been the best year for the guide. With chefs giving stars back and politely requesting inspectors don’t enter their premises, it begs the question: does Michelin matter for chefs or consumers anymore?

Before we get to that rather big question, here’s a quick run through of what’s been going on.

 

A recent guide to the Guide

Last September, Le Suquet restaurant in southern France was the first restaurant in history to have itself removed from the Michelin Guide. It had held an incredible three Michelin stars for 18 years, but chef Sebastien Bras said enough is enough, and requested to be removed. He found the pressure of retaining stars was too great and held him and his team back from serving the food they really wanted to.

More recently, The Checkers in Montgomery, Powys, also handed back their one star, which it’s held since 2011. Their reasoning was to “put family first” after “years juggling the kids with working split shifts and late hours”.

And then there’s Marco Pierre White – the original rock star chef who continues to own the news. The enigmatic chef told an Asian lifestyle website “I don’t need Michelin and they don’t need me”. He’s stated that the Michelin Guide does not have permission to visit and inspect his new Singapore restaurant, The English House.

 

Why are chefs turning their backs?

So, it’s been a tumultuous year for the Guide, which for so long has been considered the pinnacle of restaurant reviews worldwide. It’s famed for high standards, incredible expectations and brutal honesty. And therein lies the problem.

Getting a star is still an exciting achievement for any restaurant and head chef. But retaining it becomes as big a part of the job as pleasing customers. An inspection can happen at any time, meaning all-year round, a restaurant has to tick the many boxes that Michelin is looking out for.

Not knowing when a restaurant could be reviewed makes trying out something new an even more terrifying ordeal. What if the inspectors arrive on the day a new menu is introduced, and it’s just not quite right? The star’s gone.

So, it’s best to just stick with what you do.

 

Does the Guide take everything into account?

The judging criteria used by inspectors is a mystery to most. In a recent tweet, Michelin said that it’s the food on the plate that’s judged, which is why street food vendors have an equal chance of winning a star.

In a way, this is great news. The food is what matters most and great food deserves praise, wherever it’s from and however it’s served. But, speak to any chef and you can be sure that it’s not all they care about. Food is experiential, more so than ever. The décor, the feel, the atmosphere, the restaurant as a whole, they all play into the dining experience, not just the food.

If the Guide is purely critiquing the food, is that really enough? Because food today is much more than just what’s on the plate, however pretty the plate may be.

 

The cost of creativity

Chefs are inherently creative individuals. They want to cook and create the perfect menu that represents them, their tastes and their culture. Holding back a creative person is like locking a cheetah in a cage. It doesn’t want to be there, it’s not going to be happy, and the moment it gets out, you know it’s going to run.

The constant pressure of inspection causes even longer hours and even greater expectations in an industry that’s already full of long hours and great expectations. And these hours and expectations often occur at the detriment of profit, with margins often said to be lower at Michelin-focussed restaurants.

But, is that why chefs and consumers are turning their backs on the Guide? Or is it because the world of reviews has changed?

 

Reviews beyond the Guide

The Michelin Guide has been around for an astonishing 118 years. But today, there’s a world of reviews beyond the guide.

Bloggers, journalists, TV critics and review aggregator websites such as TripAdvisor have changed the face of reviewing. The Guide sits at the top, but for the average customer, why would they listen to a Guide that’s criteria for success is a secret, when they could just see genuine peer-reviews?

Restaurant A has a star, but the last 20 people that visited had a dreadful experience. Meanwhile, Restaurant B is star-less, but has page after page of flawless reviews. Where would you eat tomorrow?

We live in a society where everyone is now a critic, and everyone has a platform to share comments, pictures and reviews. This happens every day, not just once a year, making the Guide essentially behind the times as soon as it’s released.

 

Who is the Guide really for?

This begs the question, who is the Guide really for? Is it for chefs or for consumers?

Consumers undoubtedly want to enjoy the best cuisine and cooking possible and the idea of eating at a Michelin-starred restaurant still has a great appeal. It has pulling power, but it’s no longer the only factor a consumer looks at.

For chefs, winning a star is still one of the highest culinary accolades out there. It can change a career in a heartbeat. But, as we’ve seen, retaining a star is often a step too far for many creative chefs. It limits them and stifles creativity; two things that a lot of chefs won’t enjoy very much.

At the end of the day, the Michelin Guide isn’t perfect. But, it still matters a great deal to chefs and consumers alike. As Adam Coghlan, Eater London Editor, puts it: “Like driving a car on a treadmill, Michelin appear to be moving forward all the time, but really, they’re standing still. The thing is — they’re still driving the car.

One thing’s for sure. We’ll still be watching to see the updated list, because today it still is the pinnacle. The question is, how long will that last? And will we see any restaurants ask for their star to be removed in the same week the Guide’s released?

 

Insights & Trends

Planning for 2027? Don’t start with the marketing plan 

September 2026

by Anita Murray, CEO, William Murray  

For food, drink and hospitality businesses, 2027 budgets are starting to take shape. Campaigns are being mapped out and calendars are tentatively filling up with launches, events, content and communications activity. 

Before deciding what marketing activity your business needs next year, there is a more important consideration: What does the business need to achieve – and what could get in the way? 

The more specific the objectives and obstacles, the easier it becomes to make useful, strategic decisions about marketing and communications that will help businesses grow with greater certainty. 

Six questions to take into your 2027 planning 

  1. What are our most important growth objectives?

Be specific about what the business needs to achieve. Which customers, markets, products or relationships matter most? Where does growth need to come from, and what would meaningful progress look like by the end of 2027?  

Whether the ambition is to win new customers, enter a market, grow a category or create demand for innovation, the marketing plan needs a clear commercial destination. 

  1. What are the biggest obstacles to achieving them?

Where is growth most likely to get stuck? It could be competitive pressure, customer perception, differentiation, credibility, market position, lack of influence or something operational that communications needs to help address.  

Identifying the obstacle changes the conversation from “What should we do?” to “What needs to change?” 

  1. Has our market position changed?

Markets move quickly. Competitors evolve, customer expectations shift and propositions that once stood out can become familiar. Ask whether the position that worked previously will still be compelling in 2027. 

That means looking beyond your own brand. What are competitors now claiming? What do customers value? Where has the market become crowded? What new expectations have emerged? 

  1. What do our customers actually value now? 

Planning often begins with what a business wants to say. A stronger starting point is understanding what customers need to hear, believe or experience before they will change behaviour. 

Our 2026 From Visibility to Influence research found a clear gap between the messages suppliers believe they are communicating and how those messages can be experienced by operators. Suppliers talked about innovation, sustainability, partnership and understanding their customers. Operators told us they wanted clearer value, practical solutions, proof and transparency. 

That gap has commercial consequences. 

In a pressured foodservice environment, operators are already dealing with labour shortages, cost pressures, sustainability demands and supply chain challenges. Communications that add complexity or make broad claims without evidence are unlikely to earn much attention. 

The implication for 2027 planning is important: understanding customer priorities should shape the communication strategy before channels and campaigns are selected. 

  1. Where do we need greater trust, authority or influence? 

Awareness can tell you that people recognise a brand. It tells you much less about whether they trust it, value its expertise or will consider it when making a decision. 

Our research found that operators and industry influencers respond strongly to credible evidence, practical application and genuine industry contribution. 

Innovation, for example, has greater value when it demonstrates how it can make an operation easier, more efficient or more resilient. Sustainability claims become more credible when businesses can show evidence, acknowledge trade-offs and communicate progress honestly. 

For businesses planning for 2027, this raises useful points: Where do we need to influence decisions, and what would give us the authority to do so? That might involve customers, chefs, procurement teams, wholesalers, industry bodies, media or other stakeholders. 

  1. Finally, what communications activity will make a difference?

Once the growth objective and obstacles are clear, the role of communications becomes much easier to define. 

Perhaps the business needs stronger thought leadership to establish authority in a category. Perhaps it needs evidence-led communications to build credibility around a new proposition. Perhaps customer voices and practical demonstrations would do more to build confidence than another broad awareness campaign. 

And sometimes the answer will be to do less. The important thing is that activity has a clear job to do. 

Better planning starts further upstream 

Visibility has value, but commercial growth depends on what happens after someone sees you. Do they understand your relevance? Do they believe your claims? Do they trust your expertise? Will they involve you in the conversation when a decision needs to be made? 

Those questions deserve a place in the planning process. 

Before you lock down your 2027 marketing plan, make sure you have identified what is most likely to get in the way of achieving your growth objectives. That gives you a strategic basis for deciding where communications, marketing and other forms of commercial activity can help you achieve growth with greater certainty. 

Our Market Authority & Growth Roadmap is designed to help businesses take that step back: clarify the growth objective, identify the positioning, credibility, visibility and influence barriers that may be limiting growth, and establish where authority-building activity should focus next. 

Planning for 2027? Talk to us about where growth could get stuck before you decide what activity comes next. 

Insights & Trends

QSRs – is a lack of local relevance stunting your growth?

June 2026

By Rachel Taylor, managing director, William Murray

I had a great day at the QSR Redcat Media and Awards Conference on 22 June 2026, listening to operators, brands and suppliers unpack the future of growth. 

More data. More tech. More channels. More pressure on margins. 

But walking away, one thought stuck with me:   

Most QSR brands aren’t struggling to grow; they’re struggling to matter where it counts. 

Growth in this sector rarely unravels in strategy decks or boardroom discussions. More often, it is won or lost site by site, in local communities and on local high streets. 

Customers clustered in their differing localities don’t experience “the brand” in the abstract. They experience that single location, in a specific moment, in the context of their everyday lives. And that moment is far more fragile than many assume. 

If the experience feels too generic, inconsistent or disconnected, the decision is simple: customers will be indifferent.  And no one wants that. 

So how do you win? 

Look at how the high street is shifting and being redefined. It’s no longer just a place of convenience. It’s evolved to be something more social, more experiential and more community-driven – a space of connection, routine and identity: 

  • where people go to break up their day 
  • where older audiences seek a sense of connection over something simple such as a coffee and a slice of cake 
  • where date nights, small celebrations and everyday rituals play out 
  • where younger consumers spend time, choosing brands that say something about who they are because it’s social currency. 

This all points to the evolving role QSR brands need to play. The question has moved beyond: “How do we drive footfall?” It’s now: “How do we earn a place in people’s lives locally?” 

Are franchisees the most underutilised growth lever? 

Many QSR brands are stronger than ever centrally – with sharper positioning to more sophisticated channels.  But that strength doesn’t always translate consistently at a local level. 

This is where the franchisee comes in. 

They sit closer to what’s actually happening in local markets than any central team ever can. They see the nuances: how footfall shifts, how local competitors behave, what resonates culturally, customer profile types and what falls flat. 

That’s the missed opportunity when it comes to your comms programme.  

When franchisees are properly engaged and contribute to their localised comms plan, believe in it and are equipped to bring it to life, the difference is tangible. A QSR branch becomes embedded within its community, teams operate with more confidence and customers respond differently 

Why community comms is the growth boost needed 

This is where communications plays a far more important role in unlocking growth than it’s usually given credit for. 

Getting under the skin of each community to shape bespoke campaigns that capture attention and win mindshare makes a huge difference in a fiercely competitive market.   

Locally relevant comms strategies should not be viewed as a quick customised bolt-on task.  They are a growth strategy because no two locations behave the same or expect the same things. No single playbook can account for every local nuance. 

In today’s market, local relevance is the strategy. 

 

Want to hear more? 

If you’re looking at how your brand performs site by site and where the gaps are between strategy and reality, it’s worth a conversation. 

At William Murray PR & Marketing, we help QSR brands close that gap, building communications strategies that actually drive behaviour, consistency and growth on the ground.